Objectives: Evaluate the results of the Brazilian Society of Tisiology and Pulmonary Medicine Board Examination and verify the factors related to acceptance. Planning: Retrospective analysis comparing scores obtained in practical and written examinations and acceptance to gender, years since graduation, years of pulmonary medicine practice, regional and national meetings attendance, place, and duration, as well as having or not attended residence or training programs. Population: Between 1992 and 1996, 199 candidates - 81 females and 108 males - took the board examination. Results: In this period, 54.3% of the candidates were approved. Mean written score was 6.27 ± 0.95 for the approved candidates and 4.30 ± 0.76 for those who were not approved (p = 0.0001, t test). Mean practical score was 7.18 ± 0.92 versus 5.17 ± 1.38 (p = 0.001). The overall mean of the written score was significantly lower than that of the practical score (53.78 ± 13.16 x 62.62 ± 15.32, p < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that the approved group had fewer years since graduation (p = 0.001), fewer years of pulmonary medicine practice (p = 0.01); lower training attendance for a shorter period (p = 0.01), and a higher frequency of residence attendance for a longer period (p < 0.001) in the approved group. Logistic regression showed that residence (p = 0.002) and place of residence (p = 0.006) were the only predictive factors for approval. Multiple linear regression showed that only residence (coefficient 2.26, p = 0.016), place of residence (4.43, p = 0.002), and training (-1.97, p = 0.047) predicted the overall board score. Conclusion: The efficacy of the board exmination is hereby proven, since it accepts candidates with better medical background (residence). Some medical education methods, such as years of practice, meeting and training attendance need to be revised, since they do not determine approval.

Keywords: Medical education. Residence. Board certificate.