Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology

ISSN (on-line): 1806-3756 | ISSN (printed): 1806-3713


Publication continuous and bimonthly

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Advanced Search


Current Issue: 2006 - Volume 32 - Number 4 (July/August)


Profile of research published in the annals of the Brazilian Pulmonology and Phthisiology Conferences held over the last twenty years

Perfil da atividade de pesquisa publicada nos anais dos congressos brasileiros de pneumologia e tisiologia nos últimos vinte anos


Alexandre Todorovic Fabro; Hugo Hyung Bok Yoo; Thaís Helena Abrahão Thomaz Queluz



Objective: To increase the knowledge base regarding pulmonology research in Brazil. Methods: A retrospective, observational study of the abstracts published in the Annals of the Brazilian Pulmonology and Phthisiology Conferences held from 1986 to 2004, quantifying the institutions of origin by geographic distribution and type, as well as categorizing the abstracts by study design and topic. Results: A total of 6467 abstracts were published. The institutions of origin were located, variously, in the Southeast (3870 abstracts), South (1309), Northeast (783), Central-West (267) and North (84). There were 94 abstracts originating from foreign institutions, especially from institutions in Portugal (56.3%) and the United States (13.8%). Most of the studies (5825) were conducted in public Brazilian institutions. There were 4234 clinical studies, 1994 case reports and 239 original research articles. A marked, progressive increase was observed in the number of clinical studies and case reports during the period evaluated. Overall, the most common themes were tuberculosis and other infections diseases (25.2%), following by oncology (11.6%), interstitial lung diseases (8.8%) and thoracic surgery (8.5%). Nevertheless, the number of abstracts on each topic varied widely from year to year. Conclusion: Public Brazilian institutions are the principal sources of pulmonology research in Brazil. Such research activity is concentrated in the southeastern part of the country. Case reports account for one-third of this activity. Although there was great variability in the subjects addressed, diseases that are highly prevalent in Brazil, such as tuberculosis and other infections diseases, were the most common topics.



Objetivo: Contribuir para o melhor conhecimento da atividade de pesquisa em Pneumologia no Brasil. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo observacional dos resumos publicados nos Anais dos Congressos Brasileiros de Pneumologia e Tisiologia de 1986 a 2004, para descrição quantitativa da distribuição geográfica e do tipo das instituições de origem dos resumos, dos tipos de estudos e dos temas abordados. Resultados: Foram publicados 6.467 resumos, sendo 3.870 originários de instituições do Sudeste, 1.309 do Sul, 783 do Nordeste, 267 do Centro-Oeste e 84 do Norte. Houve 94 resumos provenientes de instituições estrangeiras, em especial portuguesas (56,3%) e norte-americanas (13,8%). A maioria dos trabalhos (5.825) foi realizada em instituições públicas brasileiras. Quanto aos tipos de estudos, foram observados 4.234 estudos clínicos, 1.994 relatos de caso e 239 estudos experimentais, com elevação progressiva acentuada do número de estudos clínicos e de relatos de caso no período. No cômputo geral, tuberculose e outras doenças infecciosas foram os temas mais freqüentes (25,2%), seguidos por oncologia (11,6%), doenças pulmonares intersticiais (8,8%) e cirurgia torácica (8,5%). Entretanto, houve grandes variações no número de resumos sobre cada tema no decorrer do período. Conclusão: As instituições públicas brasileiras são as principais responsáveis pela atividade de pesquisa em Pneumologia no Brasil, a qual está concentrada na Região Sudeste. Um terço desta atividade é representada por relatos de caso e, embora haja grande variação de assuntos abordados, as doenças com elevada prevalência no país, como tuberculose e outras infecções pulmonares, são os temas mais freqüentes.



Keywords: Biomedical research/statistics & numerical data; Respiratory tract diseases; Pulmonary disease (Speciality); Bibliometrics; Scientific and technical publications/statistics & numerical data; Brazil


Palavras-chave: Pesquisa biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos; Doenças respiratórias; Doença pulmonar (especialidade); Bibliometria; Publicações científicas e técnicas/estatística & dados numéricos; Brasil




The fact that research is important for the growth and development of countries is widely-recognized. In recent decades, scientific output in Brazil has increased significantly, quantitatively as well as qualitatively, as confirmed by the growing number of Brazilian articles published in journals indexed for the Institute for Science Information.(1)

In the period from 1997 to 2001, Brazilian medicine contributed 0.9% of the global output in the area.(1) However, little is known regarding the various aspects of pulmonology research in Brazil, such as which diseases and conditions are more widely studied, types of studies conducted, types of research groups, geographical distribution of research groups, sources of funding, etc. A study of some of these data was conducted in 1999,(2) consisting of a compilation of abstracts written by Brazilian authors and presented at the American Thoracic Society conference held in that year.

Even in the international literature, little is known about trends in research involving respiratory tract diseases. Some authors(3) have carried out a bibliometric assessment (evaluating production, circulation, absorbance, consumption and repercussion) of the research on respiratory tract diseases conducted in the European Union between 1987 and 1998.
Others,(4) also using bibliometric criteria, have identified the twenty leading intensive care medicine researchers in the world. Still others(5) have compared the frequency of topics in the pulmonology scientific production from 1996 to 2001 in developed countries with the prevalence of diseases in those countries.

Similar information, in addition to improving the knowledge regarding the profile of research in pulmonology in Brazil, could help determine how appropriate this research is within the context of life in the country, thus assisting funding agencies and governmental organizations in planning their investments in the fields of pulmonology, adjusting any distortions, as well as encouraging the development of vocational sectors and of sectors that are characteristic of Brazil. It is also important that these data, which are based on scientific criteria and on the research conducted by members of the specialist community, be disseminated to those in that community, thereby allowing them to plan and implement incentives, instruction, continuing education, etc.

With the objective of increasing the knowledge regarding pulmonology research in Brazil, we have conducted an observational study of the abstracts submitted to Brazilian Pulmonology and Phthisiology Conferences (1986 to 2004), as well as a quantitative analysis of the type/geographic distribution of the institutions of origin, study designs and themes addressed.


A retrospective study carried out by observing, tabulating and analyzing abstracts published in the Annals of the Brazilian Pulmonology and Phthisiology Conferences and in the journal then known as the Jornal de Pneumologia (Journal of Pulmonology) from 1986 to 2004.(6-15) The
Conferences, as well as the publication of their respective annals, occur every two years. The present study therefore comprises ten consecutive conferences. Each published abstract was evaluated critically and manually by two independent observers in terms of the following variables: year of publication; geographic region (south, southeast, central-west, north or northeast) of the institute at which the work was carried out (each abstract was counted only once - in cases of multiple institutions, the institution of the first author was the one considered - when the data contained in the abstract did not enable the identification of the institution of origin, it was classified as undetermined); type of institute at which the work was carried out, classified as Brazilian or foreign, as well as (if Brazilian) public, private or undetermined; type of study (clinical, experimental or case report); theme, according to the summary of the annals of the latest conference,(15) totaling 21 types of diseases and conditions (allergies, asthma, pulmonary circulation, thoracic surgery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung diseases, neuromotor diseases, occupational diseases, pleural diseases, gastroesophageal reflux disease, continuing education, endoscopy, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary function, oncology, sleep apnea syndrome, rehabilitation, smoking, intensive care, pulmonary tuberculosis and other infections).

The results are available in tables and graphs for analysis and interpretation.


During the study period (1986 to 2004), ten Brazilian Pulmonology and Phthisiology Conferences were held in alternate years and in the following cities/states: Recife/Pernambuco; Curitiba/Paraná; Salvador/Bahia; Brasilia/Distrito Federal; Natal/Rio Grande do Norte; Belo Horizonte/Minas Gerais; Rio de Janeiro/Rio de Janeiro; Gramado/Rio Grande do Sul; São Paulo/São Paulo; and (again) Salvador/Bahia. For those ten conferences, a total of 6467 abstracts were published. Of those, 6373 (98.5%) were related to studies performed at Brazilian institutions, of which 5825 (90%) were public, 495 (7.8%) were private, and 53 (0.8%) were of an undetermined nature. There were 94 abstracts (1.5% of the total) that summarized studies conducted at institutions located in foreign countries: Portugal (53); the USA (13); Spain (10); Mexico (4); Angola (3); Canada (3); Italy (3); Argentina (1); Ecuador (1); France (1); and Switzerland (1).

The geographic distribution of the institutions of origin for the abstracts published in the annals of each conference studied in shown in Table 1. It can be observed that, although the number of abstracts produced is, in general, increasing in all regions of Brazil, the order of frequency of the amount of abstracts has remained unchanged in several regions (listed here in decreasing order): southeast, south, northeast, central-west and north. At each conference, the number of abstracts presented by researchers in the region in which the conference was held has tended to increase, the exception being the southeast region. For 0.9% of the published abstracts, it was not possible to determine the geographic region in the institution of origin was located.

We found that 4234 of the abstracts summarized clinical studies (65.5%), 1994 summarized case reports (30.8%), and 239 summarized experimental studies (3.7%). Figure 1 shows the numbers of the different types of studies in each conference, as well as the stability of the order of frequency, although with a marked increase of the number of clinical studies and case reports and a small variation in the number of experimental studies.

Table 2 shows the distribution of abstracts by type of study and by each geographic region of Brazil, together with foreign abstracts and abstracts of undetermined origin. The ratio between clinical studies and case reports is similar (approximately 2:1) in the southeast, south and northeast regions. In the central-west region, this ratio was 3:1, compared with 7:1 in the north. The majority of the foreign abstracts were clinical studies, whereas the majority of the abstracts of undetermined origin were case reports. Most abstracts related to experimental studies were written by researchers working at institutions in the southeast region.

Table 3 shows the number of published abstracts by topic and by conference. In the overall count, tuberculosis and other infectious diseases were the most common topics, followed by oncology, interstitial lung diseases and thoracic surgery. However, there were significant variations in the number of abstracts on each topic presented at each conference, which can be observed in detail in the table.

Table 4 shows the numbers of abstracts on each topic by region. We found that, for each of the topics evaluated, there were more abstracts written by researchers working at institutions in the southeast region than by those working in any other region. In addition, regardless of the region or country of origin, tuberculosis and other infections were the most prevalent themes.


This study was carried out in order to attend the need to know more about the production of pulmonology research in Brazil and to initiate critical reflection on such production. Such reflection could form the basis for the planning and implementation of measures to promote research, funding, the formation of human resources, and aid to emerging groups, which would be taken by the professional society for those in the specialty, by the academic community or by the State.

The results show that, in the space of twenty years, 6467 abstracts were published in the Annals of the Brazilian Pulmonology and Phthisiology Conferences and that, over that period, the number of abstracts published for each conference has, in general, been increasing, growing from 428 in 1986 to 936 in 2004. In the Annals of the American Thoracic Society Conferences, which has approximately 15,000 participants, approximately 5000 abstracts are published each year.(4) Of those, only a few are related to studies conducted in Brazil. For instance, of the 5354 abstracts published in the Annals of the 1999 American Thoracic Society
Conference, 91 were written by researchers working at Brazilian institutions.(2)

In general, with the exception of those from institutions located in the southeast region, the number of abstracts from the region in which the conference is held tends to increase (Table 2), perhaps due to the encouragement of local leadership and to the reduction of travel and accommodation expenses for participants living in the region. More recently, the number of studies of Portuguese origin has grown, perhaps due to the fact that, since the year 2000, Brazilian conferences on the specialty have all been Luso-Brazilian. However, conferences have an eminently national character, and the virtual absence of Latin-American participation is noteworthy.

For all of the conferences, there was a marked predominance of abstracts from institutions located in southeastern Brazil, corresponding to 59.9% of all the abstracts published. Most of the private and public pulmonology facilities that offer undergraduate, specialization and graduate courses in Brazil are located in this region. This is also the region of the country in which the greatest number of researchers operate.(1,16) This phenomenon of research being concentrated in certain geographic regions or institutions is not exclusive to Brazil, also occurring in other countries, especially in those of continental dimensions such as ours, since the successful execution of research is directly related to adequate human resources, both in terms of quantity and quality, as well as to funding.(16-17)

It should be stressed that 90% of the abstracts published were related to studies carried out in public institutions in Brazil. Brazil invests little in research, and, except for the state of São Paulo, where the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Foundation for the Support of Research in the State of São Paulo) provides a reasonable amount of research funding, financial support for public institutions is quite irregular, whether for actual research or for human resources.(16-19)These data reinforce the idea that there is a direct relationship between research and financial support, although, above all, they highlight the commitment of professionals to performing research, despite adverse conditions, at public institutions in Brazil.

There was a wide variation of topics studied for the period evaluated. However, overall, 25.2% of the abstracts dealt with pulmonary infections, including tuberculosis, which present high prevalences in Brazil. Although these topics have maintained a prominent position in the number of abstracts published for all conferences, others, such as pulmonary circulation and smoking, rose significantly in the rankings during the period studied, and yet others, such as pulmonary function, fell. This finding seems to reflect the global trend toward waxing and waning interest in some areas of the specialty in different periods.

Due to the diversity of forms in which the abstracts were published, the lack of graphic standards and, especially, the unstructured formatting of the abstracts, a qualitative analysis of the studied material was not possible. It is known that a structured abstract improves the quantity and quality of the information furnished(20) and has therefore been recommended by most journals, including the Brazilian Journal of
Pulmonology.(21) It is of note that it was not possible to identify the institution of origin or geographic region, data that is fundamental for author identification in any scientific research, for 0.9% of the studied abstracts.

Another noteworthy finding is that 30% of the published abstracts were case reports, which, although constituting an important and legitimate form of scientific communication, do not characterize a methodologically structured type of research, which results from testing a hypothesis.
Although the number of case reports, which rose sharply throughout the period studied, began to drop gradually in 2002, such studies still accounted for nearly one-third (29%) of the abstracts published for the 2004 conference. Interestingly, the ratio between clinical studies and case reports was similar in the southeast, south and northeast, although the total number of abstracts significantly different among those regions. As previously discussed, the southeast region, in comparison with the rest of the country, is privileged in terms of human and financial resources for research. Therefore, there is no justification for the fact that case reports were the prominent form of research produced in that region. One hypothesis to explain this phenomenon is that the presentation of case reports in conferences is a cultural phenomenon in Brazilian pulmonology.
The fact that, of the foreign studies presented, only 17 were case reports (18.1%), lends support to this hypothesis. However, foreign participation has only recently become consistent and merits further study.

The data collected in the present study do not allow a full assessment of pulmonology research in Brazil, since not all of the Brazilian abstracts on the subject were studied, some having been presented at other national or international conferences on pulmonology or other specialties. Above all, the pulmonology studies published in Brazilian or other journals were not studied quantitatively or qualitatively. This last proposal would have allowed us to identify and assess the published Brazilian pulmonology research (the studies published, the impact of the journals in which they were published and the number of citations received), as has been done for other specialties or countries.(3-5,20-25) Abstracts in annals and publications in journals that are not indexed or have small circulations are part of the so-called "invisible science",(16) which is science that is not widely disseminated and that perhaps represents a significant portion of the pulmonology research in Brazil.

In summary, the evaluation of the profile of research published in the Annals of the Brazilian Pulmonology and Phthisiology Conferences over the last twenty years revealed that public Brazilian institutions are responsible for the majority of this activity. In addition, pulmonology research was found to be concentrated in the southeast region.
Furthermore, case reports accounted for one-third of all such research. Moreover, although a wide variety of topics were addressed, we found that diseases that are highly prevalent in Brazil, such as tuberculosis and other infectious diseases, were the most common themes. For a complete assessment of pulmonology research in Brazil, further bibliometric studies are needed.


1. Guimarães JA. A pesquisa médica e biomédica no Brasil: comparações com o desempenho científico brasileiro e mundial. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2004;9(2):303-27.
2. Queluz TT. Pesquisa brasileira no Congresso da American Thoracic Society. J Pneumol. 1999;25(5):III.
3. Garcia-Rio F, Serrano S, Dorgham A, Alvarez-Sala R, Ruiz Pena A, Pino JM, et al. A bibliometric evaluation of European Union research of the respiratory system from 1987-1998. Eur Respir J. 2001;17(6):1175-80.
4. Adams AB, Simonson D. Publications, citations, and impact factors of leading investigators in critical care medicine. Respir Care. 2004;49(3):276-81.
5. Rippon I, Lewison G, Partridge MR. Research outputs in respiratory medicine. Thorax. 2005;60(1):63-7.
6. 23o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Recife-PE. J Pneumol. 1986;12 Supl 1:1-98.
7. 24o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Curitiba-PR. J Pneumol 1988;14 Supl 1:1-212.
8. 25o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Salvador-BA. J Pneumol. 1990;16 Supl 1:1-130.
9. 26o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Brasília-DF. J Pneumol. 1992;18 Supl 2:1-131.
10. 27o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Natal-RN. J Pneumol. 1994;20 Supl 3:1-204.
11. 28o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Belo Horizonte-MG. J Pneumol. 1996;22 Supl 1:S1-S116.
12. 29o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Anais. Rio de Janeiro-RJ. J Pneumol. 1998;24 Supl 1:S1-S186.
13. 30o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Gramado-RS. J Pneumol. 2000;26 Supl 3:S1-S164.
14. 31o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. São Paulo-SP. J Pneumol. 2002;28 Supl 2:S1-S122.
15. 32o Congresso Brasileiro de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. Salvador-BA. J Pneumol. 2004;30 Supl 3:S1-S188.
16. FAPESP. Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa no Estado de São Paulo. Indicadores de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação em São Paulo, 2001 [monografia na Internet]. São Paulo: FAPESP; 2002. [citado 2004 Nov 20]. Disponível em:
17. Man JP, Weinkauf JG, Tsang M, Sin DD. Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19(8):811-7.
18. FAPESP. Fundação de Amparao à Pesquisa no Estado de São Paulo. Indicadores de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação em São Paulo, 2004 [monografia na Internet]. São Paulo: FAPESP; 2005. [citado 2004 Nov 20]. Disponível em:
19. Rahman M, Fukui T. Biomedical publication: global profile and trend. Public Health. 2003;117(4):274-80.
20. Taddio A, Pain T, Fassos FF, Boon H, Ilersich AL, Einarson TR. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. CMAJ. 1994;150(10):1611-5.
21. Instruções redatoriais. J Bras Pneumol. 2005;31.
22. Garcia F, Mayoralas S, Dorgham A, Granda I, Perpina M, Casan P, et al. [Analysis of the impact of Archivos de Bronconeumologia through the Science Citation Index). Arch Bronconeumol. 2001;37(11):465-70. Spanish.
23. Ramos JM, Gutierrez F, Masia M, Martin-Hidalgo A. Publication of European Union research on infectious diseases (1991-2001): a bibliometric evaluation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;23(3):180-4.
24. Lewison G, Grant J, Jansen P. International gastroenterology research: subject areas, impact, and funding. Gut. 2001;49(2):295-302.
25. Weisinger JR, Bellorin-Font E. Latin American nephrology: scientific production and impact of the publications. Kidney Int. 1999;56(4):1584-90.

* Study conducted at the "Julio de Mesquita Filho" Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP, Paulista State University) School of Medicine, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
1. Medical Student at the "Julio de Mesquita Filho" Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP, Paulista State University) School of Medicine, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
2. Attending Physician at the "Julio de Mesquita Filho" Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP, Paulista State University) School of Medicine, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
3. Full Professor at the "Julio de Mesquita Filho" Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP, Paulista State University) School of Medicine, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Correspondence to: Hugo H Bok Yoo. Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - UNESP, Departamento de Clínica Médica - CEP: 18618-000, Botucatu, SP, Brasil. E-mail:
Submitted: 12 July 2005. Accepted, after review: 3 November, 2005



The Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology is indexed in:

Latindex Lilacs SciELO PubMed ISI Scopus Copernicus pmc


CNPq, Capes, Ministério da Educação, Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia, Governo Federal, Brasil, País Rico é País sem Pobreza
Secretariat of the Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology
SCS Quadra 01, Bloco K, Salas 203/204 Ed. Denasa. CEP: 70.398-900 - Brasília - DF
Fone/fax: 0800 61 6218/ (55) (61) 3245 1030/ (55) (61) 3245 6218

Copyright 2019 - Brazilian Thoracic Association

Logo GN1