Continuous and bimonthly publication
ISSN (on-line): 1806-3756

Licença Creative Commons
1406
Views
Back to summary
Open Access Peer-Reviewed
Continuing Education: Respiratory Physiology

The role of the pulmonary function laboratory in the assessment of adults with neuromuscular disease

Danilo C Berton1, Denis E O’Donnell2, José Alberto Neder2

BACKGROUND
 
Neuromuscular disease (NMD) can affect all respiratory muscle groups, and respiratory complications are the major cause of morbidity and mortality.(1) The duration of symptoms varies depending on the underlying diagnosis. NMD can be acute (e.g., Guillain-Barré syndrome; acute spinal cord or phrenic nerve trauma or infarction; epidural abscess; acute poisoning; drug-related NMD; metabolic disturbances; tetanus or other infections; and acute myasthenic crisis) or present slowly over months (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord tumors, myasthenia gravis, syringomyelia, muscular dystrophy, and myotonic dystrophy). In the latter context, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) play a prominent role in objectively assessing respiratory muscle strength and potential consequences of weakness of the respiratory system (Figure 1).


 
OVERVIEW
 
A 55-year-old overweight man (BMI = 27 kg/m2) with a history of heavy smoking (30 pack-years) was referred for a pulmonology consultation because of long-standing sporadic inclusion body myositis. He reported having experienced leg pain and weakness since he was in his 30s and 40s, respectively. Although there were no respiratory symptoms during wakefulness (with a modified Medical Research Council scale score of 1, with no cough or phlegm) or daytime somnolence (an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 6), the patient did report episodes of nocturnal choking and frequent rhonchi. Moderate left convex scoliosis was observed on physical examination. PFTs indicated a restrictive ventilatory defect (an FVC of 62% of the predicted value and a TLC of 68% of the predicted value) and respiratory muscle weakness (an MIP of 57% of the predicted value and an MEP of 69% of the predicted value). Of note, RV and the RV/TLC ratio were within and above the upper limit of normal, respectively. A proportional reduction in DLCO (60% of the predicted value) and alveolar volume (VA; 65% of the predicted value) corresponded to a carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO) within normal ranges (94% of the predicted value = a z-score of −0.30). Diffuse myocardial hypokinesis (a left ventricular ejection fraction of 49%) was observed on echocardiography. Mild obstructive respiratory disorder was observed during overnight polysomnography (an apnea-hypopnea index of 14.6 events/h), with significant CO2 retention (mean partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 = 39, with peaks of 51 mmHg).
 
Restriction is the typical finding in patients with respiratory muscle weakness. It is suggested by reduced FEV1 and FVC with a preserved FEV1/FVC ratio and confirmed by a reduced TLC. In cases of preserved FVC, a fall > 15% in FVC from the sitting position to the supine position supports a diagnosis of diaphragm weakness.(2) This threshold can be higher in the presence of concomitant ventilatory defects.(3) A high RV/TLC ratio was a consequence of a low TLC (rather than a high RV), in keeping with restriction. Nevertheless, when the expiratory muscles are involved, RV and RV/TLC may be increased, resulting in complex restriction (reduced FVC relative to TLC).(4) DLCO is reduced in extraparenchymal restriction as a result of reduced VA, which would lead to a supranormal KCO (DLCO/VA). A “normal” KCO with preserved VA/TLC indicates some degree of concomitant intraparenchymal restriction.(5) In the current case, it was attributed to alveolar fibrosing sequelae from repeated episodes of pulmonary congestion caused by cardiomyopathy. Arterial blood gas analysis should be routinely obtained to determine whether daytime hypercapnia is present. Hypercapnia, however, may be evident during sleep only, when polysomnography with end-tidal or transcutaneous capnography is useful.
 
CLINICAL MESSAGE
 
PFTs are regularly recommended for patients with NMD who may exhibit varying rates of decline in lung function.(1) Objective testing is important because there is no correlation between respiratory muscle weakness and the degree of peripheral muscle weakness in several conditions.(6) Functional testing helps identify patients who need specific therapies, such as assisted cough, airway clearance, and ventilatory support.(1)

 
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 
All authors contributed equally to this work.

 
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
 
None declared.

 
REFERENCES
 
1.           Khan A, Frazer-Green L, Amin R, Wolfe L, Faulkner G, Casey K, et al. Respiratory Management of Patients With Neuromuscular Weakness: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2023;164(2):394-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2023.03.011
2.           Poddighe D, Van Hollebeke M, Rodrigues A, Hermans G, Testelmans D, Kalkanis A, et al. Respiratory muscle dysfunction in acute and chronic respiratory failure: how to diagnose and how to treat? Eur Respir Rev. 2024;33(174):240150. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0150-2024
3.           Allen SM, Hunt B, Green M. Fall in vital capacity with posture. Br J Dis Chest. 1985;79(3):267-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-0971(85)90047-6
4.           Clay RD, Iyer VN, Reddy DR, Siontis B, Scanlon PD. The “Complex Restrictive” Pulmonary Function Pattern: Clinical and Radiologic Analysis of a Common but Previously Undescribed Restrictive Pattern. Chest. 2017;152(6):1258-1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.009
5.           D’Cruz J, Neder-Serafini I, Zapotichny A, Neder JA. Exposing the Roots of Restriction: When the Transfer Coefficient Makes the Difference. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024;21(2):343-350. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202305-484CC
6.           Burakgazi AZ, Höke A. Respiratory muscle weakness in peripheral neuropathies. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010;15(4):307-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8027.2010.00293.x
7.           Rodrigues A, Da Silva ML, Berton DC, Cipriano G Jr, Pitta F, O’Donnell DE, et al. Maximal Inspiratory Pressure: Does the Choice of Reference Values Actually Matter? Chest. 2017;152(1):32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.045

Indexes

Development by:

© All rights reserved 2025 - Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia